![]() Firstly we use fuzzy matching on the title allowing for normalization as explained earlier. Previously it did this by matching title against title for each Release Id being used, and picked the Release Id which had the most matches but now this has been improved. 1', but in a large minority of cases enter 'No.1', Jaikoz workrounds this issue.Ĭluster Albums finds albums by artists with the same name but a different Release Id and tries to move the songs so that they are all on the same Release Id, note this is different to what 'Cluster' means in Musicbrainz Picard and perhaps I should have called it something different. For example Musicbrainz Issue #5538 shows that users usually enter song titles as 'No. We also make workarounds for common errors in entering data. This normalization is detailed in the Style Guidelines and In Jaikoz we now check for the title as it appears in your metadata and also as a normalized version as far as possible. 5) should be entered into Musicbrainz as We Have Explosive, Part 5 but they might not have been. When searching for a track we now consider more variations of the name because songs entered into Musicbrainz are normalized, for example We Have Explosive (Pt. This is one advantage of working on both Musicbrainz and Jaikoz ! Musicbrainz uses Lucene for searching with its own custom analyzer for deciding which songs are returned by a search and this latest release of Jaikoz uses the exact same analyzer to ensure scoring is compatible. For example we do not specify a duration in a search because some songs do not even have a duration within Musicbrainz so would never be returned by a search, but having got some potential results we want to give a higher score to those with a duration that matches the original song. Jaikoz searches for possible matches in Musicbrainz then rescores them taking additional information into account to find the best match, it does this because an original Musicbrainz score only takes into account the search terms when scoring but we need to consider more values. We’ve reviewed this idea and confirmed that this is planned for delivery in the next 6 months.Automatic matching is difficult but I've made a number of changes to improve the matching in Jaikoz in the latest release. Ideas in the Planned status are not attached to a binding timeline, but there is a concrete plan to implement this idea. We’ve reviewed this idea and have determined that it will be delivered in the near future. Ideas in the Not Planned status are no longer open for voting. We’ve reviewed this idea, and determined that it’s not feasible to implement right now. ![]() Ideas in the Under Consideration status are still open to community voting and discussion. ![]() We have all the info we need and are currently considering the feasibility of implementing this idea. Ideas with this status are still open to community voting and discussion. ![]() We have all the info we need and are planning to review the idea for implementation feasibility and value added to the product. Ideas are still open for voting and comments while in the Need More Info stage. #JAIKOZ DRAG AND DROP UPDATE#An update to the Need More Info status will be accompanied by a comment explaining which additional details are needed. #JAIKOZ DRAG AND DROP HOW TO#We’ve reviewed this idea, and determined we need a bit more info before deciding on how to move forward. This idea already exists! A change to the Duplicate status will include a comment linking to the existing idea, so all voting and feedback can be collected in one place. While in the New stage, it is particularly important to vote and comment to further the discussion around this idea. ![]() This idea is new to the community and hasn’t been reviewed yet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |